System = Relationship = Condition

Reality does not only need "nothing" and "something", but it also needs some way to bind them together. Since reality is a word, it describes a system, some function[1].
I made this mistake with my previous description of reality, where I assumed from the get-go that the concept inserted into reality somehow relate to one-another.
The first way to resolve this is to declare reality a "system", by which a new concept emerges.
The second way to resolve it is to declare "relationships", which, from another viewpoint, is a more direct definition, since by "system" we mean some orderly whole which interacts/relates between its internals.
The third concept, "condition" is something I thought about earlier: a system is either characterized by the condition itself, or it is caused by a condition. I'm not sure how to map it onto reality or relationship currently, other than "well, the condition is that 2 concepts exist", or something more computer-sciency "a condition always has two sides"[2].

Just like every system.


  1. What is a chair? -> not really an object or structure, more of a functionality ↩︎

  2. In programming languages, you can do if true, but that's just syntactical: a certainty, not a condition ↩︎